In a sport where margins are razor-thin and physical excellence defines outcomes, the safety and well-being of players must always be non-negotiable. That is the firm message delivered by England Women’s national team head coach Sarina Wiegman, who has publicly expressed concern over the state of playing surfaces in domestic and international competitions. Wiegman, known for her no-nonsense approach and meticulous standards, has now taken a strong stand, voicing alarm about how substandard pitch conditions pose a serious risk to player safety—and potentially, to the integrity of the game itself.
As women’s football continues to surge in popularity across the globe, the infrastructure supporting it has come under the spotlight. From training grounds to matchday venues, expectations are shifting. Fans, players, and coaches alike demand professionalism and parity with the men’s game. Yet, according to Wiegman, some fundamental issues remain unresolved, and they threaten to derail progress.
This article delves into Wiegman’s recent criticisms, the broader implications for women’s football in England, the players’ perspective, and what governing bodies must do to ensure safety remains paramount in the sport’s future.
What Triggered Wiegman’s Comments
Sarina Wiegman’s comments came after a high-profile fixture in the Women’s Super League (WSL) was marred by dangerous pitch conditions. The match, held at a stadium frequently used by a lower-tier men’s side, saw players slipping, struggling with inconsistent ball movement, and visibly adjusting their play to avoid injury. Despite the presence of elite athletes on the pitch, the playing surface appeared uneven, patchy, and poorly maintained.
Following the match, Wiegman did not mince her words. In her post-match interview, she stated:
“We talk about developing the women’s game, about professionalism, but then we put these players—world-class players—on surfaces that aren’t fit for the game. This is not just an inconvenience; it’s a risk. A serious risk.”
Her concerns weren’t isolated to this one match. Sarina Wiegman has repeatedly raised the issue with league officials, citing training pitches that do not drain properly, match venues that suffer from neglect, and inconsistency in surface quality across WSL fixtures. Her frustration reflects a deeper concern: while women’s football has grown rapidly, investment in essential infrastructure has not always kept pace.
More Than Just a Possibility
One of the central issues that Sarina Wiegman and other experts highlight is the correlation between poor pitch conditions and player injuries. Football, at any level, demands constant acceleration, deceleration, cutting, and turning—all of which become riskier on unstable or overly hard surfaces.
Several studies in sports science confirm that substandard pitches increase the likelihood of non-contact injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. This is particularly worrying in the women’s game, where ACL injuries are statistically more prevalent due to a variety of anatomical and biomechanical factors.
Earlier this year, England international and Manchester United forward Alessia Russo was sidelined for several weeks due to a sprained ankle—an injury she attributed in part to an uneven pitch. Similarly, Chelsea midfielder Fran Kirby has previously spoken about her chronic injury struggles being exacerbated by poor playing surfaces during certain WSL matches.
The cost of these injuries is not just personal—it impacts club performance, national team cohesion, and the overall marketability of the league. From fans buying tickets to broadcasters investing in rights deals, the product suffers when star players are sidelined due to preventable causes.
Comparing Men’s and Women’s Facilities
Wiegman’s comments also raise a thorny but essential issue: equality. The stark contrast between facilities available to men’s teams and their female counterparts is difficult to ignore. While Premier League clubs enjoy hybrid pitches maintained with the latest turf technology, many women’s teams still play at secondary stadiums or training grounds lacking adequate drainage or consistent maintenance.
To illustrate the disparity, consider the example of a top-tier women’s team being forced to play a winter fixture on a pitch that had hosted multiple non-league men’s matches in the days prior. The result? A surface torn up, muddy, and ultimately unplayable in certain areas. Yet, the match proceeded.
In contrast, a Premier League men’s match under similar conditions would likely have been postponed or moved—highlighting the unequal standards being applied.
Wiegman, who previously managed the Netherlands national team and won the UEFA Women’s Euro 2017, is known for her high expectations. She has now used her platform to demand accountability, not only for the safety of her players but for the future credibility of women’s football in England.
Players Speak Out “We Deserve Better”
Wiegman’s concerns have resonated deeply within the playing community. Several prominent players have since spoken up, echoing her frustration and calling for urgent change.
Arsenal and England defender Lotte Wubben-Moy commented:
“You wouldn’t put a Formula One car on a gravel track. So why are elite athletes being asked to perform on surfaces that could cause serious injury?”
Similarly, Manchester City’s Lauren Hemp posted on social media:
“We train like professionals. We eat like professionals. We compete at the highest level. But when it comes to facilities, we’re often treated like an afterthought.”
These sentiments are not merely rhetorical. Players are advocating for minimum pitch standards, independent assessments before matches, and consistent investments in groundskeeping.
The Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) has also weighed in, supporting calls for a formalized review of pitch conditions across all WSL venues. According to the PFA’s Women’s Football Director, Marie-Christine Bouchier:
“Safety isn’t negotiable. Our members deserve the same level of protection and preparation as their male counterparts.”
Steps Forward or Empty Promises
The Football Association (FA), which governs the Women’s Super League, responded to Wiegman’s concerns by stating that they are “committed to ensuring high-quality playing conditions across all venues.” They acknowledged recent incidents and noted that pitch quality is part of their ongoing WSL licensing criteria.
An FA spokesperson said:
“We are working with clubs to improve infrastructure and will continue to assess all match venues to ensure they meet minimum safety and performance standards.”
While these statements suggest progress, critics argue that enforcement has been inconsistent. Some clubs have made substantial investments in shared men’s-women’s facilities, while others continue to rely on local grounds with limited resources.
The FA has promised to allocate additional funding to grassroots and elite-level women’s facilities as part of the Women’s Football Strategy 2024–2028, but whether those funds directly address pitch conditions remains unclear.
Who Bears the Responsibility
While national governing bodies set the framework, individual clubs bear much of the responsibility for implementing change. Clubs that share resources with men’s teams often benefit from better pitches, but those that operate more independently may struggle with limited budgets.
Sarina Wiegman has called for a centralized oversight mechanism to ensure that all clubs—regardless of size or financial capacity—maintain standards that protect players.
“This shouldn’t be a matter of wealth or geography,” she stated. “Every player, whether they play for a club in London or in the Midlands, deserves the same standard of care.”
The implementation of minimum pitch standards, overseen by a neutral body, could be a way forward. Such a system could include surprise inspections, penalties for non-compliance, and a pitch-rating system visible to the public and media.
A Global Issue: England Is Not Alone
Although Wiegman’s comments focus on the English game, the problem of poor pitch conditions spans continents. In Australia, players criticized surfaces used during the Women’s World Cup warm-up matches. In the United States, several NWSL teams have played on converted baseball fields or artificial turf surfaces that were deemed substandard by players and coaches.
The global women’s football movement is calling for greater respect—not just in salaries and sponsorships but in the fundamental infrastructure of the sport.
Wiegman’s leadership, therefore, may spark an international dialogue. Her status as one of the most respected coaches in the women’s game gives her comments weight far beyond England’s borders.
What Needs to Change
To address the concerns raised by Sarina Wiegman and echoed by players, several concrete steps could be taken:
- Establish a Women’s Pitch Quality Board: An independent body that sets and enforces minimum standards for WSL and Championship venues.
- Transparent Pitch Ratings: Public reports on pitch conditions following every match to hold clubs accountable.
- FA Subsidies for Upgrades: Direct funding or matching grants for clubs that need to improve their facilities.
- Shared Resource Agreements: Incentivize Premier League clubs to share top-tier grounds and maintenance staff with affiliated women’s teams.
- Emergency Postponement Protocols: Allow coaches and match officials to delay or cancel games without penalty if pitch conditions are unsafe.
- Investment in Groundskeeping Education: Offer training programs for local ground staff to ensure consistency in pitch care.
These steps, though requiring investment and commitment, could fundamentally reshape the quality and safety of the women’s game in England.
Also Read:
