Indonesia has long stood as a colossus in the world of badminton, particularly in the doubles discipline. From the golden eras of Ricky Subagja–Rexy Mainaky and Tony Gunawan–Candra Wijaya to the more recent dominance of Mohammad Ahsan–Hendra Setiawan, the country’s proud doubles tradition has been the heartbeat of its global sporting reputation. For decades, the word “Indonesia” has been synonymous with doubles excellence, producing not just champions but icons whose influence transcends the court.
Yet, as the dust settled at the recent World Championships, the narrative took a dramatic and unexpected turn. Indonesian doubles pairs, who once instilled fear in their opponents, found themselves struggling to impose their authority. The setback was not merely about early exits or missed medals—it symbolized a disruption in a tradition that fans, players, and even rivals considered almost eternal.
This article unpacks what went wrong, what it means for Indonesia’s doubles future, and how the nation can navigate the turbulent waters to preserve its esteemed legacy.
A Tradition Forged in Greatness
To appreciate the gravity of Indonesia’s recent stumble, one must revisit the roots of its doubles heritage. Since the 1970s, Indonesian doubles shuttlers have consistently occupied podiums at the Olympics, World Championships, and All England tournaments. The chemistry, speed, tactical nous, and unwavering mental fortitude of Indonesian pairs earned them a special reputation.
Names like Tontowi Ahmad–Liliyana Natsir in mixed doubles and Markis Kido–Hendra Setiawan in men’s doubles were not just winners; they were innovators. They redefined how doubles should be played, blending flamboyant shot-making with discipline and grit. Fans around the world learned to expect Indonesian pairs to always be in contention, regardless of the draw.
This backdrop makes the latest disappointment sting even more. When a nation accustomed to excellence falls short, the questions grow louder.
The Recent Setback What Happened at the World Championships
At the most recent edition of the World Championships, Indonesian doubles teams entered with high hopes. Their preparation was thorough, and on paper, they still possessed world-class pedigree. Yet, reality painted a harsher picture.
- Men’s Doubles Struggles: Indonesia’s top men’s doubles pairs were outperformed by rivals from China, Japan, and Korea. The sharpness that once defined their fast attacking play seemed dulled. Defensive lapses and inconsistency in execution left them vulnerable against younger, hungrier opponents.
- Women’s Doubles Challenges: Traditionally Indonesia’s weaker doubles sector, women’s doubles once again failed to break through. Despite improved efforts, the pairs could not match the relentless stamina and discipline of their East Asian counterparts.
- Mixed Doubles Disappointment: Once a crown jewel thanks to legends like Natsir, mixed doubles also fell short. Chemistry issues and an inability to handle pressure points proved costly, with Indonesian pairs unable to convert key opportunities.
The end result? Indonesia left the championships without a doubles title—an outcome that would have been almost unthinkable in previous decades.
Rivals Closing the Gap—and Surpassing
One explanation for Indonesia’s struggles lies not just in their own shortcomings, but in the rise of rivals.
- China’s Resurgence: Chinese doubles pairs have rediscovered their sharpness, bringing back memories of their dominant eras. Their physical preparation, shot accuracy, and discipline have once again set a benchmark.
- Japan’s Tactical Mastery: Over the past decade, Japan has invested heavily in doubles strategies, producing pairs that combine lightning defense with relentless counterattacking.
- Korea’s Tenacity: Korean doubles teams, especially in women’s and mixed, embody sheer grit. Their ability to grind rallies and sustain intensity exposed gaps in Indonesia’s current pairs.
In short, the world has not stood still. While Indonesia’s tradition is mighty, other nations have built systems designed to close the gap, and in Paris, it showed.
The Burden of Expectation
Another dimension to this setback is psychological. Indonesian doubles players do not merely represent themselves; they carry the weight of history. The pressure to uphold decades of dominance can be suffocating, especially when every match is scrutinized by millions of passionate fans.
Former champions have acknowledged this challenge. Hendra Setiawan once admitted that wearing the Indonesian jersey often feels heavier than any opponent across the net. For younger players, the legacy can be both inspiring and intimidating. Against top-tier opponents, this burden sometimes manifests as hesitation or unforced errors in critical moments.
Structural Issues in Development
Beyond individual performances, systemic challenges are also part of the story.
- Talent Pipeline Concerns: While Indonesia continues to produce talented juniors, the transition to elite-level doubles success has not been seamless. Younger players often struggle to adapt to the physical demands and strategic sophistication required at the world stage.
- Coaching Transitions: The departure of legendary coaches has left gaps. While the current staff are capable, the coaching consistency that once defined Indonesia’s dominance has wavered.
- Injury Management: Some key doubles players have battled recurring injuries, disrupting rhythm and preparation. Without stable pairings and consistent training blocks, synergy suffers.
Voices from Within Reactions to the Setback
The disappointment at the World Championships sparked a flurry of reactions within Indonesia’s badminton community.
- PBSI’s Response: The Indonesian Badminton Association acknowledged the results were below expectations and promised a thorough evaluation. Officials stressed that the focus now shifts to building long-term resilience.
- Former Players’ Insights: Legends like Rexy Mainaky emphasized the need for fresh tactical approaches. “The world knows Indonesia’s doubles DNA,” he remarked. “We must evolve while staying true to our strengths.”
- Fans’ Perspective: Among the Jakmania of badminton—the loyal supporters who fill arenas with chants of “Indonesia! Indonesia!”—there was frustration but also unwavering belief. Many fans took to social media to remind players that setbacks are part of the journey.
Learning from the Past
This is not the first time Indonesia has faced turbulence. In the early 2000s, following the retirement of several legends, the nation also endured a medal drought. Yet, through persistence, innovation, and the emergence of new heroes, Indonesia rebounded.
The lesson is clear: while the present setback stings, history shows that Indonesia possesses the resilience to bounce back.
Pathways to Redemption
How can Indonesia restore its doubles supremacy? Several strategies could be pivotal:
- Reinforcing Youth Development: A sharper focus on developing U-19 and U-21 doubles specialists could ensure continuity. Tailoring training programs to modern demands—fitness, mental toughness, and data-driven strategies—will be crucial.
- Tactical Innovation: Rivals have studied Indonesia’s traditional fast-attacking style. To stay ahead, Indonesia must diversify, blending defensive patience with explosive offense.
- Pairing Stability: Constant reshuffling of pairs has often hindered chemistry. Committing to long-term pairings could yield stronger partnerships.
- Mental Conditioning: Investing in sports psychologists can help players manage the crushing pressure of carrying national expectations.
- Learning from Rivals: Instead of resisting change, embracing lessons from Japan’s discipline, China’s precision, and Korea’s grit could help Indonesian doubles evolve.
Also Read:
