The lights dimmed at Old Trafford as the final whistle blew, but the shadows that followed were far heavier than the night sky. Manchester United had just endured another demoralizing derby defeat, and the fallout was immediate. The disappointment was not merely about losing three points to their noisy neighbors — it was about what the defeat revealed. The gulf in class, the fragility of United’s system, and the mounting pressure on Ruben Amorim, the man tasked with reviving one of football’s most storied institutions, were all laid bare.
The result raised an urgent question: what comes next? For Amorim, for the players, and for a club that has wandered through a decade of turbulence, the answers are not straightforward. To understand the road ahead, we must examine the challenges facing the team, the state of Amorim’s project, the structural issues surrounding the club, and the possible futures Manchester United may face.
The Context A New Era That Still Feels Unsettled
When Ruben Amorim was appointed, optimism was cautiously rekindled. United’s hierarchy believed his innovative tactics and success with Sporting Lisbon could translate into a new identity for a club long adrift since Sir Alex Ferguson’s retirement. He was young, dynamic, and seen as a forward-thinking strategist who could blend youth development with modern football principles.
But football does not offer grace periods in the Premier League. Between relentless media scrutiny, the demands of the fanbase, and the unforgiving fixture list, managers are judged immediately. Amorim knew he was inheriting a fractured squad, built by multiple managers with conflicting philosophies, yet he also understood the expectation: to restore United to glory.
The derby defeat, therefore, was not just another result — it was a litmus test of whether the project is moving forward. For many, it suggested stagnation or even regression.
Amorim’s Vision Versus the Reality
Ruben Amorim’s tactical identity is rooted in a flexible 3-4-3 or 3-5-2 system, emphasizing pressing, compactness, and fluid attacking transitions. At Sporting, this approach allowed young players to thrive while the team maintained defensive solidity.
At United, however, implementation has been messy. Several challenges have emerged:
- Squad Unsuitability – Many players were not recruited with Amorim’s system in mind. The back three, a cornerstone of his tactics, struggles due to inconsistent center-backs and fullbacks uncomfortable in hybrid roles.
- Pressing Gaps – High pressing demands discipline and unity; United’s pressing often looks disorganized, leaving spaces that opponents exploit.
- Creative Burden – Bruno Fernandes shoulders too much responsibility in attack, while others fail to consistently contribute.
- Injuries and Fatigue – A relentless schedule has left key players unavailable, further complicating tactical consistency.
The derby exposed these flaws ruthlessly. While City pressed and played with cohesion, United looked like a collection of individuals still learning a new language.
Is Amorim Still the Right Man for United
This is the question dividing the fanbase and punditry alike. Some argue that Amorim deserves time — projects built on philosophy require patience, and chopping and changing managers has only deepened United’s malaise in the past. Others counter that results are the ultimate currency, and if Amorim cannot deliver big-game performances, his vision may never materialize.
Arguments for keeping faith in Amorim:
- He has a proven track record of building competitive teams.
- United desperately need stability; another managerial change would reset progress yet again.
- Young players like Alejandro Garnacho and Kobbie Mainoo could flourish under his guidance.
Arguments against him:
- His system may not be adaptable to the Premier League’s pace and intensity.
- Fan patience is thin, and another season of mediocrity could have long-term consequences.
- The psychological scars of repeated big defeats can undermine dressing-room belief.
The truth likely lies in between. Amorim is a talented coach with ideas worth pursuing, but he faces a monumental task in an environment that often suffocates innovation with its impatience.
The State of the Squad
United’s roster remains a patchwork. Years of scattergun recruitment under multiple managers have left a group lacking cohesion.
- Goalkeeper: André Onana has shown flashes but continues to divide opinion with errors.
- Defense: Injuries to key defenders like Lisandro Martínez have left United relying on inconsistent backups. The fullback positions remain unsettled.
- Midfield: Casemiro’s form has dipped, while the reliance on Bruno Fernandes for creativity is unsustainable. Young Mainoo offers promise but needs time.
- Attack: Marcus Rashford is out of form, Antony has failed to justify his price tag, and the striker position lacks a prolific presence.
This imbalance makes it nearly impossible for Amorim to execute his full tactical vision. Reinforcements are needed, but recruitment must be smarter than in the past.
Ownership and Structural Problems
No discussion of United’s present or future can ignore the ownership issue. The Glazers remain deeply unpopular, with fans protesting their stewardship regularly. While Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s INEOS has taken a stake with promises of structural reform, uncertainty persists about long-term control.
The lack of a coherent footballing structure has been United’s Achilles heel for a decade. Recruitment has been inconsistent, managers have had too much or too little say, and decisions have often been reactive rather than strategic. Amorim cannot succeed without systemic change above him. Manchester City’s dominance, after all, is built not just on Pep Guardiola but on alignment between ownership, sporting director, and manager.
Short-Term Priorities
In the aftermath of the derby defeat, Amorim must focus on immediate goals to stabilize the season:
- Rebuilding Confidence: Wins against mid-table teams are crucial to restoring belief.
- Simplifying the System: Rather than forcing a half-baked version of his philosophy, Amorim may need to adopt a pragmatic approach temporarily.
- Establishing Leaders: Ensuring veterans like Fernandes and Varane are visibly supportive is vital for dressing-room morale.
- Youth Integration: Developing Garnacho, Mainoo, and others could inject freshness and buy goodwill with fans.
The short-term is about survival and momentum. Without it, the long-term may never arrive.
Long-Term Vision What United Must Decide
Looking further ahead, United must choose a path:
- Option 1: Back Amorim Fully
Commit to his philosophy, reshape the squad around his system, and tolerate short-term struggles for long-term cohesion. This requires patience from ownership and fans alike. - Option 2: Reset Again
Dismiss Amorim if results stagnate and pursue another manager. While tempting, this risks perpetuating the cycle of instability and undermines any hope of a clear identity. - Option 3: Hybrid Path
Support Amorim but demand tactical flexibility. Encourage him to adapt his ideas to the Premier League while still aiming for identity in the long run.
Of the three, the first offers the most hope of genuine transformation, but also the greatest risk of short-term pain.
Fan Expectations and the Weight of History
At United, expectations are not defined by recent struggles but by decades of dominance under Ferguson. Supporters demand a team capable of competing for titles, not merely qualifying for Europe. This disconnect between current reality and historical identity creates enormous pressure on any manager.
Amorim’s challenge is therefore not only tactical but emotional. He must convince fans that his project is worth the wait — that beneath the defeats, seeds of growth are being sown. Without that belief, frustration will only intensify.
Lessons from the Past
United’s post-Ferguson history is littered with “false dawns.”
- David Moyes was billed as the chosen successor but lasted less than a season.
- Louis van Gaal delivered an FA Cup but struggled to modernize United’s play.
- José Mourinho won the Europa League yet left amid acrimony.
- Ole Gunnar Solskjær offered moments of promise but lacked consistency.
- Erik ten Hag brought a trophy and hope, only for momentum to stall.
Each era began with optimism but collapsed under the weight of structural dysfunction and impatience. The lesson is clear: unless the club builds a coherent strategy and sticks with it, no manager can thrive.
The Global Spotlight
Manchester United are not just a football club; they are a global brand. Defeats like the derby reverberate beyond Manchester, impacting sponsorships, fan engagement, and even financial markets. Amorim’s future, therefore, is not merely about results but about maintaining United’s place as a commercial giant.
This dual identity — as both sporting powerhouse and corporate entity — complicates decision-making. The temptation to prioritize short-term optics over long-term planning often wins out. If United are to return to footballing dominance, sporting decisions must take precedence.
Also Read:
