Rangers’ march into the Scottish League Cup semi-finals continued with a 2-0 victory over Hibernian, but the win was overshadowed by growing unrest among fans directed at manager Russell Martin. Despite the turbulence surrounding the Ibrox dressing room, the Gers delivered a solid, disciplined performance to secure a place in the last four, raising both questions and hope in equal measure.
The triumph highlighted Martin’s tactical nous, the resilience of his squad, and key individual performances that made the difference. At the same time, the match served as a reminder that off-field tensions remain a significant backdrop to Rangers’ current campaign.
Pre-Match Context Turmoil and Tension
-
Rangers Under Pressure
Rangers entered the match under an unusually intense period of scrutiny. A mixture of inconsistent league results and perceived tactical shortcomings had fans vocal in their criticism of Russell Martin. Despite the Scottish Cup and European campaigns providing opportunities for redemption, supporters had become restless, questioning whether Martin’s philosophy was suited to the demands of a club of Rangers’ stature.
Several key players had also experienced dips in form, and injuries to pivotal figures forced Martin to adapt his squad selection. The manager faced the dual challenge of motivating his team while also addressing the growing fan dissatisfaction outside the stadium.
-
Hibernian’s Position
Hibernian, on the other hand, arrived at Ibrox with confidence. Known for their energetic pressing and quick transitions, the Hibees were intent on upsetting Rangers’ rhythm. Manager Nick Montgomery emphasized a balanced approach—containing Rangers’ attacking threats while exploiting spaces on the break.
Historically, Hibernian have troubled Rangers in cup competitions, adding an extra layer of intrigue. This clash was expected to be tight, physical, and fiercely contested.
First-Half Overview Rangers Assert Control
From the opening whistle, Rangers demonstrated an intent to dominate possession. Martin’s tactical setup—typically a 4-3-3 formation—focused on width, ball circulation, and midfield dominance.
-
The Opening Goal
The breakthrough came in the 23rd minute. Rangers worked a patient build-up through the middle, with Ryan Kent linking play to Nathan Patterson on the right flank. Patterson’s precise cross found Joe Aribo at the near post, and the midfielder calmly slotted home.
The goal exemplified Rangers’ approach: careful possession, calculated pressing, and clinical execution when opportunities arose. For Aribo, it was another demonstration of his value in linking midfield and attack, while Kent’s creative influence remained pivotal.
-
Hibernian’s Response
Hibernian attempted to respond immediately. Their midfielders pressed aggressively, forcing Rangers into a few uncharacteristic errors in the defensive third. A curling shot from Kevin Nisbet in the 36th minute required a smart save from goalkeeper Allan McGregor, signaling that Rangers would need to remain vigilant.
Despite these moments, Rangers largely controlled the tempo, showcasing Martin’s ability to instill composure even under pressure.
Second-Half Sealing the Victory
After the break, Rangers maintained their dominance but faced increased pressure from Hibernian, who recognized that a goal could dramatically shift the dynamics.
-
Casemiro-esque Discipline
Rangers’ midfielders, particularly Joe Aribo and James Tavernier, exhibited disciplined positioning, cutting off passing lanes and limiting Hibernian’s creative options. Hibs struggled to find rhythm, often relying on hopeful long balls rather than coordinated build-up play.
-
The Second Goal
The decisive strike came in the 67th minute. A rapid counter-attack saw Kent drive into Hibernian’s half, evading two challenges before laying off a perfect pass to Antonio Colak, who finished clinically past Hibernian goalkeeper Matt Macey.
The goal deflated Hibernian’s morale and effectively sealed the tie. Rangers then managed the remainder of the match expertly, protecting their lead and demonstrating both mental and tactical discipline.
Tactical Analysis
-
Rangers’ Approach
Russell Martin deployed a 4-3-3 system, emphasizing:
- Width and spacing: Full-backs pushed high, providing crossing opportunities.
- Controlled possession: Rangers circulated the ball patiently, waiting for gaps in Hibernian’s defense.
- Midfield control: Aribo and Tavernier dominated transitions and disrupted Hibs’ pressing patterns.
-
Hibernian’s Strategy
- High press: Aimed at forcing turnovers in midfield.
- Rapid counter-attacks: Using pace on the wings to exploit spaces left by Rangers’ advanced full-backs.
- Compact defensive shape: Attempting to limit chances through the central channel.
Hibernian’s plan worked intermittently, particularly in the second half, but Rangers’ organization and composure ultimately nullified these threats.
Key Player Performances
- Ryan Kent (Rangers, 8/10): Instrumental in both goals; his dribbling and vision kept Hibernian’s defense under constant pressure.
- Joe Aribo (Rangers, 8/10): Scored the opener and controlled midfield transitions.
- Antonio Colak (Rangers, 7/10): Clinical finish for the second goal and solid hold-up play.
- Allan McGregor (Rangers, 7/10): Made crucial saves to maintain the clean sheet.
- Kevin Nisbet (Hibernian, 7/10): Threatened Rangers’ defense but lacked sufficient support.
- Matt Macey (Hibernian, 6/10): Pulled off key saves but could do little against Colak’s finish.
Fan Reactions and Unrest
Despite the win, a section of Rangers supporters expressed discontent. Fan protests targeted Russell Martin, questioning his tactical decisions, player selections, and overall suitability for the role.
-
Sources of Discontent
-
- Perceived conservative approach: Fans argued that Martin overcomplicates simple scenarios, especially when managing a high-profile squad.
- Inconsistent league performances: Cup success has been overshadowed by uneven league form.
- Tactical rigidity: Some supporters felt the team lacked adaptability against different opponents.
Yet other fans recognized the team’s resilience and celebrated the tactical discipline that secured a semi-final spot. Social media reflected a division between optimism and frustration—a duality that continues to define Martin’s tenure.
Managerial Reactions
-
Russell Martin
Post-match, Martin acknowledged the pressure but remained confident:
“We knew this would be a challenging game. Hibernian are a well-organized side. I’m proud of how the team executed our plan. Of course, I hear the fans, and I understand their concerns. But results like this show that progress is being made.”
He also emphasized focus on the next stages of the League Cup and league commitments, urging players and supporters to unite behind the squad.
-
Nick Montgomery
Hibernian’s manager praised his players’ effort but admitted Rangers’ discipline and composure were decisive:
“We created chances, but they were clinical. Their organization and focus made the difference today. We must learn from this and respond positively in our next league fixture.”
Statistical Breakdown
- Possession: Rangers 57% – Hibernian 43%
- Shots (on target): Rangers 14 (6) – Hibernian 10 (3)
- Corners: Rangers 7 – Hibernian 5
- Pass Accuracy: Rangers 83% – Hibernian 78%
Statistics illustrate Rangers’ control of possession and higher chance creation, though Hibernian remained competitive, especially in transitional phases.
Implications for Rangers
-
Short-Term Impact
The win propels Rangers into the League Cup semi-final, keeping their silverware hopes alive. It also offers a morale boost, reinforcing belief in the squad’s abilities despite fan unrest.
-
Medium-Term Considerations
Martin must now reconcile tactical philosophies with the squad’s strengths and fan expectations. Maintaining league form while advancing in cup competitions will be critical to sustaining momentum.
-
Long-Term Strategy
Rangers’ management will need to assess whether Martin’s approach aligns with club ambitions. Tactical discipline is evident, but adaptability and engagement with the fanbase remain key challenges.
Hibernian’s Takeaways
Despite the loss, Hibernian can draw positives:
- Competitiveness at Ibrox shows growth in mentality.
- Young players gained valuable experience in high-pressure situations.
- Tactical adjustments in the second half displayed adaptability, even if ultimately insufficient.
For Montgomery, lessons from the match will shape league strategies and future cup campaigns.
Historical Context
Rangers and Hibernian have a rich history of cup encounters. Matches between the two clubs are often intense, tactical, and emotionally charged. Today’s result continues that tradition, highlighting Rangers’ dominance in knockout fixtures but also exposing vulnerabilities that will need addressing as the semi-final approaches.
Future Fixtures and Challenges
-
Rangers’ Next Matches
-
-
- League fixtures against Celtic and Aberdeen will test squad depth and consistency.
- League Cup semi-final awaits, where tactical flexibility and mental resilience will be vital.
-
-
Hibernian’s Road Ahead
- Scottish Premiership matches against Hearts and St. Mirren will require tactical cohesion and improved finishing.
- Player rotation and injury management will be crucial to maintain competitiveness across competitions.
Also Read:
